HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12212 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devesh Pathak, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party no. 1, Miss. Neha Tiwari, advocate, holding brief of Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no. 3 i.e. General Manager (Personnel) to decide the representation dated 24.09.2025 contained as (Annexure No.1) preferred by the petitioner and also if any dues is found payable to the petitioner the same shall be paid to the petitioner within time bound period in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the benefit of IInd A.C.P grade par Rs 2800 since 01.12.2008 instead of 17.09.2025 and third A.C.P grade pay Rs 4200 since 12.08.2017 which is wrongfully denied to the petitioner in the light of circular dated 20.06.2025 passed by Managing Director Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 4/Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya and the opposite party no. 4 may be directed to consider and decide the same within a stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Narayan Shukla, Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava Sheshnath Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 4/Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya; within a period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 4 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. Needless to say that if any amount is found due to be paid to the petitioner, the same shall be paid accordingly. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 15, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 12212 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench