HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1058 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri S.N. Shukla, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rahul Shukla, the Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Mohd. Talib Khan, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pankaj Gupta, the learned Standing Counsel for Gaon Sabha and perused the records. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that after filing of the instant writ petition praying for a direction for removal of encroachment the authorities have taken action and the encroachment has already been removed and that the petitioner's grievance does not survive any more. 3. The learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State has received instructions to the same effect, a copy whereof has been provided to the court, which is kept on record. 4. Accordingly, the petition has become infructuous and it is dismissed as such. October 15, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachichida Nand Shukla, Shivam Kumar Mishra, Utkarsh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Irfan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Rural Evelopment) U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench