Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201712 (MAD)

G.SUNDARRAJAN, v. UNION OF INDIA,

WP/18037/2024 · 2025-11-21

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No.18037 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.11.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.18037 of 2024 G.Sundarrajan : Petitioner Versus Union of India represented by The Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi 110001. : Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration declaring that Paragraph 7 II(i) of the EIA notification dated 14 September 2006 is, to the extent of non- inclusion of climate change in the said paragraph, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and directing the respondent- Union of India to include the expression “climate change” as one of the vital environmental concerns in paragraph 7II(i) of the EIA notification dated 14 September 2006. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Radhakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.V.Chandrasekaran, Senior Panel Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.18037 of 2024 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to include the expression “climate change” in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) notification dated 14.09.2006 relating to environmental clearance process for new projects. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that climate change aspect was considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M.K.Ranjitsinh and others vs Ors [W.P 2019] where the issue of climate change, as a serious threat, was noticed. Therefore, in the environmental clearance proceedings under the notification, proper amendment is necessary. 3. We are of the view that what is being raised by the petitioner before this Court is a matter to be considered by the experts as to the manner in which environmental clearances have to be granted, and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.18037 of 2024 not by this Court. 4. The petitioner may approach the respondent and submit a representation in this regard. 5. The petition stands closed. There will be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 21.11.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No tar To The Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi 110001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.18037 of 2024 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN , J. (tar) WP No.18037 of 2024 21.11.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis