JITENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/1262/2023 · 2025-10-15
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201702 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201702 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1262 of 2023 Court No. - 28 HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A (2) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been preferred against the impugned order dated 20.03.2023, passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Balrampur in Bail Application No. 43/2023 (CNR No. UPBB -010007132023), Computer Registration No. 358/2023, under Sections 436, 504, 506 I.P.C. and under Section 3(2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Balrampur, whereby the bail application of the appellant has been rejected. It is informed by the learned counsel for the appellant that trial has been concluded and the appellant has been acquitted. Therefore, this appeal has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. October 15, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : R.N. Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Aditya Tiwari, Giriraj Prajapati (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) Jitendra Pratap Singh .....Appellant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench