HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9921 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Dinesh Kumar Ojha, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Prashant Kumar Srivastava, the learned counsel for the opposite party - Bank of Baroda. 2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the opposite party to return the amount of Rs.1,16,000/- which has erroneously been deposited in the petitioner's K.C.C. loan account after closure of the loan account. 3. On the basis of instructions, the learned counsel for the opposite party- bank states that the bank will return the amount within a period of two weeks to the petitioner's savings bank account which are available with the opposite party. 4. Keeping in view the aforesaid statement made on behalf of the learned counsel for the opposite party- bank, the writ petition stands disposed off. October 15, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : Prashant Kumar Srivastava (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Johar Ali .....Petitioner(s) Bank Of Baroda Branch Pratapgarh Thru. Branch Manager .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench