INDRA PRATAP SINGH v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (URBAN) THRU. ITS MANAGER DIRECTOR LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/12214/2025 · 2025-10-15
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201693 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201693 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12214 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Krishna Vishwakarma holding brief of Shri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the competent authority for release of post retiral benefits along with interest thereof in view of the fact that petitioner has superannuated from service on 31.01.2024 and no dues certificate has also been issued to him.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before respondent No. 3 i.e. The Chief Accounts Officer, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid reliefs, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 15, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Indra Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Its Manager Director Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench