SAKSHI MISHRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1373/2025 · 2025-10-15
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201681 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201681 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1373 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing of the cognizance order dated 05.02.2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Unnao, in Criminal Case No. 1474 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 697 of 2024 under Sections 356(2), 351(3), 83 of B.N.S. and Section 67, I.T. Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Unnao, as well as chargesheet No. 05/2025 dated 03.01.2025 under Section 351(3) of B.N.S. in the aforesaid case crime number.
3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants are permitted to move their discharge application(s) within four weeks from today and in case any such application(s) are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jaikaran Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sakshi Mishra And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
7. In case of failure on the part of applicants in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, they will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.
8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. October 15, 2025 A.Nigam NA528 No. 1373 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench