Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20167 (AP)

K. Narasimhulu v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/18705/2020 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010283202020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18705/2020 Between: 1. K. NARASIMHULU, S/O NARASIMHULU AGE 46 YEAR, R/O D.NO.8- 76, SRINAGAR COLONY, 2ND STREET, TIURPATHI URBAN, TIRUPATHI-II CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI 2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUPATI II TOWN PS, TIRUPATI-II CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN II TOWN PS TIRUPATI-II, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. PASUPULETI RAGHU RAM, S/O SUBBAIAH D.NO.1-68, SRINIVASAPURAM TIRUCHANOOR ROAD, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATI URBAN CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARAM NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2 to 4 respondents refused to receiving compliant dated 03.10.2020 of the petitioner against 5th respondent regarding the illegal and high handed action to trespass into the vacant site of the writ petitioner to an extent of 143 square yards in 49 of Avilala village Tirupathi urban limits and removed the compound wall on east side and north side which is illegal arbitrary and principles of natural Justice…” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 02.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18705 of 2020 Dated.02.09.2025 ASR 101