Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201664 (ALL)

MAHESH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER

/10312/2024 · 2025-10-14

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10312 of 2024 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Rama Kant Dixit, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Shri Amit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant after arguing at some length has submitted that he does not want to press this application. The applicant is ready to surrender before the court concerned. However, he has also submitted that the applicant may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386). 3. As prayed, by learned counsel for the applicant, the application is dismissed as not pressed. 4. However, it is directed that in case the applicant surrenders before the Court concerned within one week from today and prefers bail application, the court concerned will decide the said bail application within two weeks thereafter taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 5. For a period of three weeks. no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. October 14, 2025 Pks Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rama Kant Dixit, Ram Vishal Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Amit Kumar Singh, Shrikant Chaudhary Mahesh Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench