HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12173 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner,Sri R.S.Tewari, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1 & 2, Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :- "A-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. party no.3 to grant promotion to the Petitioner w.e.f. 27.06.2007. the date on which her batchimates and juniors were promoted, along with all consequential benefits. B-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. party no.3 to grant her all consequential service benefits including fixation of pay, arrears of salary, increments, and pensionary benefits w.e.f. 27.06.2007. C-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. party no.3 to revise the seniority list by placing the Petitioner in her rightful position above her juniors. D-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. party no.3 to decide the pending representations of the Petitioner dated 03.09.2021 and 29.09.2021 within a fixed time frame, by passing a reasoned and speaking order." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghvendra P. Singh, Vimal Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Prakash Yadav Sarita Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/District Basic Education Officer, District-Ayodhya and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within a stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims before the opposite party no. 3/District Basic Education Officer, District-Ayodhya within a period of fifteen days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. October 15, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12173 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench