Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201639 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD KALEEM ANSARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/8765/2025 · 2025-10-14

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8765 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Rajendra Prasad Lodhi, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "to set-aside/quash the entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 1057/2023 (State Versus Kaleem Ansari and others) arising out of impugned charge- sheet no. 40/2022, dated 24.03.2022 filed by investigating officer against the applicants/petitioners in Case Crime No. 0046/2022, Under Section- 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. pertaining to Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District- Bahraich which is pending before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bahraich as well as summoning order dated 17.01.2023 passed by the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bahraich on the basis of compromise which was held in between the parties on 20.09.2025, as contained in Annexure No. 1, 2 & 4 respectively to this petition, in the interest of justice." 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajey Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohammad Kaleem Ansari And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. October 14, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 8765 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench