Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201637 (ALL)

KAJAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/9754/2025 · 2025-10-14

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9754 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Ramakar Shukla, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.63 of 2025, under Section 103(1), 61(2) of BNS, P.S. Shivgarh, District Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that some unknown person had killed the son of the informant with the use of sharp instrument. The applicant was not named in the FIR. Subsequently, in the statement of the daughter of the informant and subsequent statement of the informant, name of the applicant surfaced only to the effect that the deceased used to talk to the applicant. No allegation of causing of the offence was levelled against the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the informant and learned AGA have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the statement to be a weak piece of evidence coupled with the fact that the applicant is a lady having no criminal antecedent, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Kajal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brijesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kajal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 14, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9754 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench