CHANDRA SEKHAR AZAD ALIAS PINTOO VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
/6807/2022 · 2025-10-14
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201635 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201635 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6807 of 2022 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Heard Sri Dadu Ram Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This petition has been filed seeking following main relief:-
"1. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the History Sheet No.32-A dated 26.04.2015 opened in Police Station Kotwali Utraula, District Balrampur by summoning its original."
3. Counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit between the parties have been exchanged.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that wrongly and illegally the History Sheet of the petitioner was opened. Even otherwise, the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the History Sheet of the petitioner was opened in the year 2015 and on the basis of same, the surveillance cannot be made after two years in view of Regulation No.231 of the U.P. Police Regulations but it is still going on.
5. Learned A.G.A. submits that he has no instructions as to whether the surveillance is still going or not and it has to be decided by the Superintendent of Police concerned as per law and the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Rama Shankar Vs. State of U.P. and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh, Dadu Ram Shukla (D.R. Shukla ) Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Chandra Sekhar Azad Alias Pintoo Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
Others; Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.7463 of 2025.
6. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a comprehensive representation before the Superintendent of Police, Balrampur for discontinuing the surveillance. In case such a representation is moved within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of by him in accordance with law and by a reasoned order within a period of four weeks.
7. The consequences shall follow accordingly as per law. October 14, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 6807 of 2022 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench