Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20163 (RAJ)

RAJESH SUMAN S/O SHRI RAM VILAS SUMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8300/2025 · 2025-05-27

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22207] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8300/2025 Rajesh Suman S/o Shri Ram Vilas Suman, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Ward No. 32, Sakatpura, Kota, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Energy, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur- Through Its Managing Director. 3. Chief Engineer, Ramgarh Gas Thermal Power Project, Ramgarh, Jaisalmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sameer Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Lodha Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Ankit Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 27/05/2025 1. Petitioner has filed instant writ petition, feeling aggrieved by the order dated 09.05.2025 issued from the Office of Chief Engineer, Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, whereby and whereunder, the working arrangement of petitioner as Technician Assistant ITI at KTPS, Kota has been cancelled and he has been immediately directed to report and joint his duty at RGTPP, Ramgarh, Jaisalmer. 2. Counsel for petitioner pointed out that petitioner has certain family adversarial circumstances, which do not warrant him to join at RGTPP, Ramgarh, Jaisalmer immediately. [2025:RJ-JP:22207] (2 of 2) [CW-8300/2025] 3. Counsel for petitioner, having instructions from petitioner, submits that if this Hon'ble Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned transfer order on merits, at least, petitioner may be permitted to submit a Representation before the respondents, to consider his adversarial circumstances. 4. On behalf of respondents, learned Senior Counsel-Mr. Virendra Lodha has put in appearance as caveator and submits that in case any Representation is filed by the petitioner, same shall be considered in accordance with law. 5. In view of above, without interfering with the impugned order dated 09.05.2025 and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to petitioner to submit a Representation before the respondents pointing out his family adversarial circumstances, which may be considered by the respondents in accordance with law. 6. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/20