ANSHU RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
/9900/2025 · 2025-10-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201625 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201625 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9900 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.340 of 2025, under Sections 69, 351(3) BNS, P.S. Rudauli, District Ayodhya.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on account of false pretext of marriage for the last one year physical relation was formed in between the applicant and the victim. Similar statement was given by the victim under Section 183 BNSS that the relation continued since the year 2019. The tentative age of victim is 19 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the statement and the relationship continued for substantial period of time, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 31.8.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Anshu Rawat be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey, Amit Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anshu Rawat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9900 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench