1 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:5623 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9227 of 2024 a/w connected petitions Date of Decision: 11.03.2025 _______________________________________________________ (1) CWP No.9227 of 2024 School Management Committee, Primary School Kaza II ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents ________________________________________________________ (2) CWP No. 9767 of 2024 School Management Committee, Primary School Langza II ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents ________________________________________________________ (3) CWP No. 10275 of 2024 School Management Committee, Primary School Manhum ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents ________________________________________________________ 2 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:5623 ) (4) CWP No. 11041 of 2024 School Management Committee, Primary School Tangti Yongma ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents ________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 No. ___________________________________________________ For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikrant Chandel , Advocate, for the petitioner(s) in CWPs No.9227, 9767 & 11041 of 2024 Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No.10275 of 2024. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Mr. Sushant Kaprate, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) Heard. Taking into consideration the averments made in these petitions as also the replies filed by the respondents, we are of the considered view that the respondents are required to have a complete re-look into the matter, given the fact that the admissions are now shortly to be made. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:5623 ) 2. Accordingly, the instant petitions are disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to re-consider the matter after taking into consideration the averments made in these petitions and after calling for a factual discourse on the aspect of the matter. Needful be done within a period of three weeks from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. For compliance, to come up on 01.04.2025. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) March 11, 2025 Judge (VH)