PAPPU @ VIVEK VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/6603/2025 · 2025-10-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6603 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.68 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2), 65(1) B.N.S. and Sections 5L/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Balrampur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently in her statement under Section 180 BNSS the victim did not support the prosecution story and stated that she had gone out of her own free will. The tentative age of the victim is around 16 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the statement of the victim not supporting the prosecution story and medical also not corroborating the allegations, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 24.3.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Pappu @ Vivek Vishwakarma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pappu @ Vivek Vishwakarma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 6603 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench