Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:11670 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 673 of 2024
--------- Uday Prasad Singh, aged about 70 years, Son of Late Guru Sahay Prasad Singh, Resident of - Deokinandan Niwas, S. P. Kothi Chowk, Behind Old Age Home, Dipu Garha, P.O.- Hazaribag, P.S.Korra, District-Hazaribag, Jharkhand
....Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Smt. Suman Cathrin Kispotta, Wife of not known to the petitioner, Vice Chancellor, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh situated at Sindur, P.O.- Reformatory School, P.S.- Sadar, District-Hazaribagh.
3. Mokhtar Alam, Son of not known to the petitioner, Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh situated at Sindur, P.O.- Reformatory School, P.S.-Sadar, District-Hazaribagh.
4. Rahul Purbar, Son of not known to the petitioner, Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Technical Education & Skill Development, Jharkhand Ranchi having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi Jharkhand.
....Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sameer Saurabh, Advocate For the O.P.-State : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, A.G.
Mr. O.P. Tiwari, G.P.-III For the O.P.-VBU : Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocate
Ms. Khusboo Kumari, Advocate
--------- 10/Dated:-17.04.2025
1.
Mr. Rahul Kumar Purwar, Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Technical Education and Skill Development and Mr. Ram Niwas Yadav, Director, Higher Technical Education and Skill Development are present in person pursuant to the order passed by this Court.
2.
Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned Advocate General submits that the order has been complied in true letter and spirit and a show cause has also been filed on behalf of O.P. No.4 indicating
2025:JHHC:11670 2 the same therein.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner though does not dispute the contention of the O.P.-State, however, submits that there is some calculation error with regard to payment of fixation so, he may be given liberty to raise this grievance before an appropriate authority, if so advised.
4.
Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant contempt application stands disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
5.
It goes without saying that personal appearance of the Principal Secretary as well as the Director, Higher Technical Education and Skill Development is dispensed with.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-