HARI PRASAD MAURYA v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
/6055/2025 · 2025-10-14
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201546 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201546 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6055 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. None appears for the petitioner. The record indicates that by means of the instant petition the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the revision pending before respondent no.1 since 2020. This Court finds that apart from a solitary order sheet dated 18.09.2025 there is nothing on record to indicate as to what is the cause of delay, accordingly, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition. The petition is dismissed leaving it open for the petitioner that in case if any cause for expedition arises, he may be permitted to file a fresh petition with complete updated order sheet. The petition is dismissed with the said liberty. October 14, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durga Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Hari Prasad Maurya .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench