Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010225262023 2025:GAU-AS:12178 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5896/2023 RAJENDRA CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE MONILAL CHOUDHURY, TANGLA TOWN WARD NO.3, P.O. AND P.S. TANGLA, ASSAM, CONTACT- 7002721580/9435184224 VERSUS THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER AND 4 ORS. UDALGURI DISTRICT, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL REGION, ASSAM 2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 3:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER DHANSIRI FOREST DIVISION UDALGURI DISTRICT UDALGURI ASSAM 4:TREASURY OFFICER UDALGURI ASSAM 5:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (R AND B) UDALGURI DISTRICT UDALGURI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D K DAS, MR C KUMAR,MR. R K AGARWALA,MR H BETALA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FOREST,SC, FINANCE,SC, PWD,SC, BTC Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 08-09-2025 Heard Mr. DK Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. RK Mushahary, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 5, Mr. A Chaliha, learned, Standing Counsel, Finance Department appearing for respondent No. 4 as well as Mr. SR Baruah, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent No. 1. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to refund an amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- along with applicable taxes and charges paid by the petitioner as advance forest royalty for issuance of forest permit for carrying boulders/forest materials for construction work allotted to the petitioner at Udalguri (R&B) Division. 3. The petitioner was allotted the work for “Protection work on both sides of Tangla-Dimakuchi road in the form of Boulder protection and RCC retaining wall under SOPD-G”. The petitioner was instructed to deposit Rs. 4,00,000/- as royalty for issue of forest permit. Accordingly, the petitioner deposited the required total amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- on different dates. 4. Mr. DK Das, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the work awarded has been executed to the satisfaction of the concerned authorities and since the petitioner has completed the work by paying the required advance forest royalty, the respondent authorities are incumbent upon to refund the Page No.# 3/3 amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- along with applicable taxes and charges which was paid as royalty for issuance of forest permit. However, despite repeated applications, the respondent authorities have failed to refund the said amount and therefore, he submits that respondent authorities may be directed to refund the same to the petitioner. 5. RK Mushahary, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 5 as well as Mr. SR Baruah, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent No. 1 have submitted that since the amount claimed by the petitioner is not disputed, the respondent authorities may be directed to refund the same as may be permissible. 6. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties, this Court deems it proper to direct the respondent authorities to verify the claim of the petitioner and after verification if it is found that the petitioner is entitled for refund of Rs. 4,00,000/- along with applicable taxes and charges, same be refunded to him. It is accordingly ordered. The entire exercise so directed hereinabove shall be completed within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 7. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant