Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201539 (ALL)

VIRENDRA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO.

/9889/2025 · 2025-10-14

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9889 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State on this bail application filed in case crime No.112 of 2025 under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 352, 351(3) BNS, 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha), 3(2)va, 3(2)v of SC/St Act, P.S. Maheshganj, district Pratapgarh. and perused the record. 2.Learned A.G.A. submits that the present bail application is not maintainable as the bail of the accused applicant Virendra Yadav has been rejected by Special District & Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, SC/ST Act. There is a statutory alternative remedy of filing an appeal under section 14-A of SC/ST Act. 3.On due consideration to the bar under S.C.S.T. Act, i.e. a special Act, present bail application under section 483 BNSS cannot be entertained. 4.The application is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the applicant to file an appeal under SC/ST Act against the rejection order. 5.The office is directed to return certified copies of the documents, annexed with the bail application, to the applicant's counsel, as per rules. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nisha Devi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Virendra Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) A copy thereof be retained on the record. October 14, 2025 kkb/ BAIL No. 9889 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench