Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201538 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. /ADDL. CHIEF SECY. AYUSH ANUBHAG -I LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/12087/2025 · 2025-10-14

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12087 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to opposite parties to make payment of pension and other outstanding post-retiral dues along with arrears with effect from the date of his initial appointment on 22.05.1995. Interest on the same has also been sought. 3. It has been submitted that similarly situated employees of the Department as the petitioner have already been granted aforesaid benefits which have not been provided to petitioner. 4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Ayurvedic Services, Government of U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 14, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui, Shiv Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vinod Kumar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Ayush Anubhag -I Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench