Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201537 (MAD)

SAKTHIVEL v. State by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/28103/2025 · 2025-10-17

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 28103 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 28103 of 2025 1. SAKTHIVEL 2. ARUN Petitioner(s) Vs State by The Inspector of Police Ayilpatty Police Station, Namakkal District. Crime no. 134/2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioners/accused 1 and 2 on bail in the event of arrest in connection with the above said Crime No. 134/2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Thirumalai B For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28103 of 2025 ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of the BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 134 of 2025, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The allegations against the petitioners are that they, in collusion with other other accused, were involved in the illegal quarrying of gravel, sand and stones from Government poromboke land in Karkoodalpatti Village. Upon seeing the officials, they fled the scene, abandoning a JCB bearing registration No.TN-28-CZ-4753 and a Tipper Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-28-CX- 3989. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that they are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28103 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent police, submitted that the investigation in this case is pending, hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Considering the nature of allegations, the submissions made by learned counsels on either side, and considering the fact that the petitioners are not only illegally quarried gravel sand but also caused damage to the ecology, therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 17-10-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28103 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28103 of 2025 To 1.State by The Inspector of Police Ayilpatty Police Station, Namakkal District. Crime no. 134/2025. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 28103 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 28103 of 2025 17-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis