VIJAY KUMAR OJHA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. REVENUE SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/7898/2025 · 2025-10-14
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 7898 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Badrish Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to pass an order restraining respondent nos. 3 and 5 from issuing or executing the patta until the consolidation proceedings are duly completed in accordance with Rule 109 of the Consolidation Act, and a declaration is made specifying the extent of land belonging to the Gram Sabha.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while the consolidation proceedings are pending, the Gram Sabha is granting lease/patta to various people.
4. On the contrary, learned State Counsel submits that the averments made in the writ petition are wrong, no patta is being granted by Gram Sabha or Sub-Divisional Magistrate during the pendency of consolidation proceedings.
5. In view of above submissions made by respondents, nothing remains to survive the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of. October 14, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priya Mishra, Sheel Nidhi Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Vijay Kumar Ojha .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Revenue Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench