SANTRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE DISTT. MAGISTRATE BAHRAICH AND 4 OTHERS
/9438/2025 · 2025-10-14
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201515 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9438 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent nos. 1 to 4 to restrain respondent no. 5 not to construct road between the house and 'sahan' land of the petitioner forcibly.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents has brought to our notice that for the similar cause action, the writ petitioner has filed earlier writ petition bearing Writ-C No.7185 of 2025 and by an order dated 31.07.2025, the aforesaid writ petition has been disposed of with direction to the petitioner to avail the remedies prescribed under law.
4. It is to be noted that in the present writ petition, the fact of filing earlier writ petition and the disposal of the same has not been brought on record. This amounts to suppression of material facts. However, considering the fact that the writ petitioner is an indigent person, we are not imposing any cost.
5. The writ petition is dismissed. October 14, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Santram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Distt. Magistrate Bahraich And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench