Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201513 (ALL)

PRTEEK SRIVASTAVA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND OTHERS

/1702/2024 · 2025-10-14

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1702 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Sri Yogesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners is reported to be ill. However, there is no request for pass over or adjournment of the case on behalf of Sri Hariom Dwivedi, the other counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 2. None is present on behalf of the respondents except learned Additional Government Advocate. 3. This Court had passed the following order on 11.03.2024:- "Shri Hari Nath Singh appears on behalf of opposite party no. 4 as he has filed a caveat. Pleadings be exchanged between the parties within eight weeks. List thereafter. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of First Information Report dated 24.02.2024 bearing Case Crime No. 162 of 2024 alleging commission of offence under Sections 406, 420, 504, 506 I.P.C. lodged with Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Barabanki. After hearing the parties, prima-facie no offence is made out against the petitioners, as it is said that criminal liability cannot be fastened upon the petitioners for any act done by their predecessors i.e. the father/husband as the case may be. It is accordingly provided that the petitioners shall not be arrested in the aforesaid criminal case unless there is sufficient and cogent evidence available against them indicating commission of criminal offence as alleged in the impugned First Information Report. However, they shall cooperate in the investigation and get their statements recorded before the Investigating Officer within one month. If they do not do so then it can be made a ground for seeking vacation of this interim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogesh Singh, Hariom Divedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Abhishek Misra, Hari Nath Singh, Jitendra Singh Prteek Srivastava And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Others .....Respondent(s) order. The Investigating Officer may continue the investigation and conclude it as per law. " 4. Learned AGA, on the basis of telephonic instructions, submits that the charge sheet No.290/24 dated 09.11.2024 has been forwarded to the concerned court on 29.08.2025. Thus, this petition has rendered infructuous. 5. Dismissed accordingly. October 14, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 1702 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench