Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201512 (ALL)

SHIVRAJ VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/10058/2025 · 2025-10-14

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10058 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has prayed for the following substantial reliefs: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI quashing and setting aside the illegal, arbitrary, fraudulent and malafide spot memo/Mauka Muayana report dated 27.09.2025 prepared by Respondent No. 4 (Lekhpal) in respect of land bearing Gata No. 80, categorized as Abadi land, situated in Village Yasheenpur, Behta Gokul, Tehsil Sadar District Hardoi Uttar Pradesh. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the District Magistrate/Sub-Divisional Magistrate to conduct fresh, fair and impartial inquiry in accordance with law of the Gata No. 80 with proper notice to the petitioner. III. Issue an interim order directing all the respondents, their officers, servants, agents and all persons acting on their behalf or under their authority or control to maintain complete status quo with regard to the property bearing Gata No. 80, Abadi land, Village Yasheenpur Tehsil Sadar District Hardoi." 3. Upon hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, we are Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anadi Chitranshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shivraj Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) of the view that the District Magistrate being respondent No. 2 is directed to carry out a proper spot verification and thereafter determine the ownership of Gata No. 80 after giving proper notice to the petitioner and the private respondents. 4. The above process should be completed within a period of eight weeks from date. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. October 14, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 10058 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench