Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201504 (ALL)

VINAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO.

/9896/2025 · 2025-10-14

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9896 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.78 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 127(2), 64(2)(da) and 87 BNS, P.S. Gola, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently in the statement under Section 180 BNS the victim disclosed her age as 19 years and stated that she had gone alongwith applicant on her own free will and thereafter similar statement was given under Section 183 BNSS where she also admitted that the marriage was solemnized and thereafter she gone alongwith applicant. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the victim is aged about 19 years and had gone alongwith applicant on her own free will and stayed with him, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 18.2.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vinay Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinay Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9896 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench