Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201495 (MAD)

E.VIJAYALAKSHMI v. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION,

WP/48136/2025 · 2025-12-16

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.48136 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.No.48136 of 2025 E.Vijayalakshmi .. Petitioner vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.9, Santhome High Road, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. 2.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Sriperumbudur – 602 105. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 20.11.2025 seeking cancellation of the fraudulent settlement deed dated 09.09.2014 bearing document No.10248/2014 registered at the office of the Sub Registrar, Sriperumbudur and to take appropriate action in accordance with law within the time to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh for M/s.R.Arunkumar For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.48136 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner asserts that settlement deed dated 09.09.2014 bearing Document No.10248 of 2014 was executed on the basis of the invalid legal heirship certificate dated 12.09.2007. In support of such contention, order dated 06.11.2025 of this Court in W.P. No.39641 of 2025 is relied upon. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents may be directed to consider the petitioner’s representation seeking cancellation of settlement deed dated 09.09.2014. 3. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for both the respondents. He submits that the petitioner should approach the jurisdictional civil Court and that the registering authorities do not have the power of cancellation. 4. On perusal of the order dated 06.11.2025 in W.P. No.39641 of 2025, it appears that this Court recorded a finding that the legal heirship certificate dated 12.09.2007 is not genuine. Therefore, it is open to the petitioner to rely on the said order in civil proceedings 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.48136 of 2025 before the jurisdictional Civil Court so as to seek cancellation of settlement deed dated 09.09.2014 bearing Document No.10248 of 2014. 5. With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 16.12.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mmi To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.9, Santhome High Road, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. 2.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Sriperumbudur – 602 105. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.48136 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J. mmi W.P.No.48136 of 2025 16.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis