MADHAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HORTICULTURE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/12088/2025 · 2025-10-14
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12088 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to authorities concerned restraining them from making any deductions in pay of petitioner for Sundays and other Gazetted Holidays. Further prayer for grant of minimum pay scale has also been sought alongwith dearness allowance without such deductions .
3. It has been submitted that earlier vide order dated 29.03.2025, petitioner has already been granted minimum of pay scale of a Class - IV but deductions are being made for Saturdays and other Gazetted Holidays.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Horticulture & Food Processing, 2-Sapru Marg, Lucknow - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. October 14, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ateeq Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Madhav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Horticulture Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench