MAMTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 5 OTHERS
/9968/2025 · 2025-10-14
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201489 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201489 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9968 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition rather seeks liberty to approach the appropriate court for redressal of his grievances.
3. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. October 14, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Mamta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench