ANKUR KUMAR TRIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
/9884/2025 · 2025-10-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201488 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201488 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9884 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Shri Rajneesh Pandey, learned counsel for the informant who has filed his vakalatnama today and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.320 of 2024, under Sections 238, 103(1), 140(2), 3(5) BNS, P.S. Sakran, District Sitapur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the co accused Anuj Shukla and Puneet Shukla @ Anurag having similar allegations have been enlarged on bail vide order dated 29.8.2025 and 10.9.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 696 of 2025 and Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 8636 of 2025.
4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 6.9.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ankur Kumar Trivedi be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, Mohd. Shahid Akhtar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ankur Kumar Trivedi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9884 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench