Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201482 (ALL)

RINKU SINGH @ AJAY PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO.

/6100/2025 · 2025-10-14

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6100 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following main relief (s) :- "Issue an directing or order the learned Additional District and Session Court, Room no. 2 Pratapgarh to decide the trial of S.T. No. of two 527/2009 of Crime No. 265/2007 State of U.P. Vs. Sarver and others, expeditiously within the shortest possible period period of time at earliest possible date." Learned A.G.A., at the very outset, raised a preliminary objection stating that for the relief sought the petitioner has a remedy under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. On being confronted, after taking note of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy available. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the papers, if any, to the learned counsel for the petitioner as per rules. October 14, 2025 ML/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajjoo Singh, Anand Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Rinku Singh @ Ajay Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench