LIYAKAT ALIAS LIYAKAT ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/9941/2024 · 2025-10-14
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201472 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201472 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9941 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Heard Sri Sudhakar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This petition has been filed seeking following main relief:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing of the impugned history sheet No. 93A dated 24-02-2024, made by opposite party no. 3, on the basis of the criminal history arising out from enmities, as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that wrongly and illegally the History Sheet of the petitioner has been opened and the surveillance has been made and despite representation made by the petitioner to the District Magistrate, District Amethi, it has neither been considered nor
disposed of till date.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that the decision in the matter of opening of history sheet as per law can be taken by the Superintendent of Police concerned in view of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court rendered in the case of Rama Shankar Vs. State of U.P. and Others; Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.7463 of 2025 and in case, the petitioner moves a representation before the Superintendent of Police, Amethi , the same shall be considered and disposed of by him in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Vivek Tripathi Liyakat Alias Liyakat Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
accordance with law.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will move a representation before the Superintendent of Police, Amethi within a period of 10 days and it may be directed to be decided within some short stipulated period. To which there is no objection by the other side.
6. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a comprehensive representation before the Superintendent of Police, Amethi. In case such a representation is moved within a period of 10 days from today, the same shall be considered and
disposed of by him in accordance with law and by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks thereafter.
7. The consequences shall follow accordingly as per law.
October 14, 2025 Raj CRLP No. 9941 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench