HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1454 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.0636 of 2025 under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 308(4), 309(6), 109(1), 351(3) BNS, P.S. Kotwali, District Kheri. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.It is alleged in the prosecution case that at 9.30p.m. while the named accused persons were busy in extracting ransom in front of Dhaba, they came and have taken meal and refused to give money. They demanded Rs.5,000/- as Rangdari which was refused by the complainant. Then they assaulted the complainant by a country-made pistol in his head and started beating him. Rs.20,000/- cash and a golden chain have also been snatched. While going away, life threat was given. Specific allegation of giving threat is on the applicant. 4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. The injured has not received any fracture. It is a case of false implication. 5. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. He submits that the complainant/injured has supported the prosecution case. The two independent witnesses have also Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shitesh Jha, Dr. Shailendra Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dev Juneja @ Dipanshu Juneja .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) supported the prosecution case. The injured was medically examined. He has suffered four injuries. Dr. Akhilesh Kumar in his statement has opined that the injuries received by the injured were grievous in nature. 6.Considering the above aspects of the matter, perusal of the record, injury report, statement of Doctor as also statement of the injured and two independent witnesses, it cannot be said that it is a case of false implication. The anticipatory bail is an exceptional jurisdiction. This court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the accused applicant. 7.The application is accordingly dismissed. October 14, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1454 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench