RAMENDRI SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FINANCE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/12123/2025 · 2025-10-14
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201463 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201463 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12123 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned to provide service and other benefits from the initial date of appointment for purposes of pensionary benefits and consequential allowances in the light of the judgment rendered by this Court dated 02.05.2023 passed in WRIT - A No. - 33060 of 2019, Raghvendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and others.
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Director, Director, National Saving Department, Vikash Deep Bhawan, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order in the light of judgment referred to herein above, in case the same is applicable, within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 14, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Phool Bux Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ramendri Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Finance Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench