RAJ KUMAR SANGAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. GEOLOGY AND MINING LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/8625/2025 · 2025-10-14
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201417 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201417 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8625 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anurag Verma, learned A.G.A. for the respondents-State.
2. Under challenge is the order dated 23.07.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, whereby sanction for prosecution under Section 197 Cr.P.C. has been granted.
3. Preliminary objection has been taken by the learned A.G.A. for the respondents that keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pramila Virendra Kumar Agarwal and Another (2020) 17 SCC 664 the issue relating to the validity of the sanction for prosecution can be considered only during trial.
4. Considering the aforesaid the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open for the petitioner to raise any objection that he may have pertaining to sanction for prosecution before the trial court. October 14, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Dubey, Saurabh Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Raj Kumar Sangam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Geology And Mining Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench