ASAGAR ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
/9912/2025 · 2025-10-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201416 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201416 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9912 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.84 of 2025, under Sections 108, 351(3) BNS, P.S. Mishrikh, District Sitapur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it is alleged that the sister of the informant was being harassed by the applicant on account of some inappropriate photos and videos because of which she committed suicide. The cause of death as per post mortem report is ante mortem hanging.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the post mortem report and the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mariano Anto Bruno and Anr vs Inspector of Police, 2022 Livelaw (SC) 834, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 1.8.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Asagar Ansari be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajiv Raman Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Asagar Ansari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9912 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench