VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/9215/2024 · 2025-10-14
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201414 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201414 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9215 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Heard Ms. Vedika Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State. None appears on behalf of the private respondent.
2. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"I-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opp. parties/ police not to harass the petitioner in absence of any F.I.R. lodged against the petitioner, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions dated 20.01.2025 received from Shri Pradeep Kumar Gangwar, Sub-Inspector, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda, which has been produced before this Court and taken on record, submits that there is no FIR in the matter, therefore, the question of harassment by police does not arise.
4. Even otherwise the petitioner has not deposited Rs. Versus
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Himanshu Tiwari, Vedika Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Amar Singh, Jitendra Kumar Gupta, Suresh Kumar Gupta Vijay Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
1,87,000/- in compliance of the order dated 06.12.2024, which has not been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. In view of above, the petition is disposed of in terms of statement of learned AGA for the State. October 14, 2025 Raj CRLP No. 9215 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench