Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201400 (ALL)

MUSTKEEM AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYAT RAJ U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/10022/2025 · 2025-10-14

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10022 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Devendra Mohan Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. 2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction for taking action on his complaint made against the respondent Nos.5 and 6. 3. On the basis of instructions, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has submitted that a preliminary inquiry has already been held and upon receipt of report thereof, a show cause notice has been issued to the respondent Nos.5 and 6 calling upon them to submit their reply. 4. As the proceedings on the petitioner's complaint are already underway, there is no occasion for this Court to interfere in this petition which is disposed off accordingly. October 14, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Mustkeem Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench