Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201393 (ALL)

GOPI NATH PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/12103/2025 · 2025-10-14

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12103 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to opposite parties to provide benefit of first and second Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme in pursuance of Government Order dated 04.05.2010. Relief for arrears and interest has also been sought. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e.State of U.P. through its Additional Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Civil Secretariat, U.P., Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. October 14, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashwini Kumar Ojha, Nirmala Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Gopi Nath Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Rural Development Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench