RIJWAN ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
/7335/2025 · 2025-10-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201378 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201378 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7335 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Shri Durgesh Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 178 of 2025, under Sections 74, 64(2)j, 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S. Rupaidiha, District Bahraich. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant used to talk with the applicant who in the false pretext of marriage misbehaved with her. Subsequently in the statement udder Section 183 BNSS the victim stated that she was in relationship with the applicant since last three years and physical relations was also formed between them on the false pretext of marriage and thereafter the applicant refused to marry her. 4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the relationship continued for a span of 3 years and the age of the victim is around 22 years, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 2.7.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Sharma, Sheikh Mohammad Ali Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Durgesh Kumar Pathak Rijwan Ali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Rijwan Ali be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7335 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench