Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201377 (ALL)

X COMPLAINANT IN CASE CRIME NO. 609/2024 THRU. S.H.O. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

/9008/2024 · 2025-10-14

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9008 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. 2. Counter affidavit filed by learned AGA for the State is taken on record. 3. None is present on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the private respondent is present. 4. This Court had passed the following order on 27.11.2024:- "1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to 4 to make fair, proper and speedy investigation in pursuance of the First Information Report No.609/2024 dated 31.08.2024 under Sections 376-D, 506 I.P.C. & Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Unnao against the opposite party no.5 and two unknown persons. 3. Learned A.G.A. prays for and is granted three weeks time for filing an affidavit of the Investigating Officer concerned with regard to active investigation made in the case. 4. One week time thereafter shall be available to petitioner for filing rejoinder affidavit, if any. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Laxmi Kant Pathak, Jyotindra Prakash Pathak, Malik Faiyaz Ahmed Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Shamsher Yadav Jagrana X Complainant In Case Crime No. 609/2024 Thru. S.H.O. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. List thereafter. " 5. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions, submits that after completion of investigation, the Final Report dated 14.12.2024 was prepared and forwarded to the concerned supervisory authority. Thus, this petition has rendered infructuous. 6. It appears that on account of the aforesaid fact, none is present on behalf of the petitioner. 7. Dismissed accordingly. October 14, 2025 Raj7 CRLP No. 9008 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench