Amareek Singh v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME , LAKHIMPUR KHERI AND ANOTHER
/3307/2025 · 2025-10-14
Saurabh Lavania
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201372 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201372 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3307 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The present Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been filed for quashing of the summoning order dated 25.07.2025, passed in Case No.309/2025, arising out of Case Crime No.0088/2025, under Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act, Police Station - Dhaurahra, District - Lakhimpur Kheri as well as for quashing of the entire proceedings of the Case No.309/2025, arising out of Case Crime No.0088/2025, under Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) of the SC/ST Act, Police Station - Dhaurahra, District - Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the appellant and liberty may also be given to the appellant to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ashok Kumar, Chandra Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Amareek Singh .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home , Lakhimpur Kheri And Another .....Respondent(s)
the appellant. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer/Court concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, he would not take any coercive action against the appellant in the aforesaid case.
It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. October 14, 2025 ML/- CRLA No. 3307 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench