[2025:RJ-JP:24262] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9608/2025 Rajesh Kumar Sharma S/o Chhitar Lal Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Sitarampura, Tehsil Piplu District Tonk Rajasthan At Present Working As Driver Vaishali Nagar Depot Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Chief Manager, Vaishali Nagar Depot R.s.r.t.c. District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9609/2025 Jay Singh Jat S/o Shri Sua Lal Jat, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Mehandwas Tehsil Phagi District Jaipur Rajasthan At Present Working As Driver Vaishali Nagar Depot Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Chief Manager, Vaishali Nagar Depot R.s.r.t.c District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9610/2025 Rajendra Kumar Tak S/o Jagdish Prasad Tak, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Chandsen Tehsil Malpura District Tonk Rajasthan At Present Working As Driver Vaishali Nagar Depot Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through [2025:RJ-JP:24262] (2 of 3) [CW-9608/2025] Its Chairman And Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Chief Manager, Vaishali Nagar Depot R.s.r.t.c District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9611/2025 Basant Kumar Nama S/o Shri Kailash Chand Nama, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village And Post Bagera Tehsil Kekri District Ajmer At Present Working As Driver Vaishali Nagar Depot Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Chief Manager, Vaishali Nagar Depot R.s.r.t.c District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 02/07/2025 Since, the issue involved in these writ petitions is common, they are being tagged. Although, these writ petitions are filed seeking a direction to the respondents to revise their salary or to amend the basic pay but, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they would feel contended if these writ petitions are disposed of with a liberty to file representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their [2025:RJ-JP:24262] (3 of 3) [CW-9608/2025] grievance(s) and the respondents are directed to decide the same in accordance with law. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, these writ petitions are disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- 1. The petitioners are at liberty to submit representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. 2. The respondents are directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order thereupon within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt with communication of the decision to the petitioners. 3. If the petitioners feel aggrieved of the decision taken by the respondents, they would be at liberty to avail the remedy available under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/77 78 79 & 80