Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 201327 (ALL)

SMT. GUDIYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/9984/2024 · 2025-10-14

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9984 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. 2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present. On earlier date also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 3. This petition has been filed seeking following main relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus be issued commanding the opp. Party No.2 to 4 to restrain the opp. party No.5 not to disturb the peaceful married life of the petitioners & not to harass the petitioners." 4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions dated 22.04.2025 received from In-charge Inspector, Police Station Mubarakpur, District Azamgarh, submits that no F.I.R. is registered against the petitioners, therefore, the question of harassment to the petitioners does not arise. The said instructions are taken on record. 5. Since no one has appeared for the petitioners, therefore, it appears that on account of the aforesaid fact, none is appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 6. Dismissed accordingly. October 14, 2025 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Smt. Gudiya And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench