Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:61 RFA No. 678 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 678 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
SMT.MENAKA.N W/O A.C.RAMESH KUMAR, D/O LATE NATARAJAN, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/A NO.83/1, 2ND MAIN ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PALANIMUTHU.K., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
SRI. GOPALAKRISHNA S/O LATE V.NATARAJAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/A NO.83/1, 2ND CROSS, SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020.
2.
SRI. SRINIVASA S/O LATE V.NATARAJAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/A NO.83/1, 2ND CROSS, SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020.
3.
SRI. PARTHASARATHI S/O LATE V.NATARAJAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/A NO.83/1, 2ND CROSS,
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:61 RFA No. 678 of 2023
SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) and also before the Court on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting time, office objections are not complied with as of today. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections for the sixth time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the appeal is filed in the year 2023. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The appeal is pending for almost two years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:61 RFA No. 678 of 2023
appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non- compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 66