SUNDARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
/6421/2025 · 2025-10-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 201293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6421 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 99 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 238 PBS, P.S. Ramgaon, District Bahraich.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it is alleged that son of the informant had gone to the residence of the applicants and subsequently he was hanged to death. The cause of death as per the post mortem report is ante mortem strangulation. The applicant is a lady.
4. Learned AGA relies upon the statement of the witness who had stated that on the date of incident the deceased was misbehaving with the sister in law of the said witness which was seen by the applicant as well as her husband and thereafter he was throttled to death.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the statement on record and there being no specific allegations that the applicant has caused the throttling, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 10.4.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Sundari be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sundari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 6421 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench