SHAILESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/3820/2025 · 2025-08-04
Rajesh Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20129 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20129 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:21607
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3820 of 2025
Shailesh Kumar, aged about 42 years, son of Shri Nirmal Prasad Sahu, resident of: Shiv Mandir, Village- Hesalong, P.O. & P.S Mc-Luskiganj, District-Ranchi;
….........Petitioner
Vrs.
1.The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi;
2. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O.GPO, Ranchi, P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi;
3. Circle Officer, Khalari, P.O. &P.S.-Khalari, District-Ranchi;
.......... Respondents
…....
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate
Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Sr.S.C.-I
03/04.08.2025 The writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s): For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ/ order commanding upon the respondents to dispose of Demarcation Case No:28 of 2024-25 and also supply the Trace map and True copy of Measurement details within a specified period.
2. It appears that even the contesting person has not been made party in the present writ petition. However, after some arguments,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent State is present and has no objection.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
A.Mohanty