HEERA MEENA W/O SHRI SURAJ MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6928/2025 · 2025-06-11
Anand Sharma V J
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20128 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20128 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23092] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6928/2025
1. Heera Meena W/o Shri Suraj Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 500, Kanota Saind Ki Puliya Kanota Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).
2. Guddi Devi W/o Shri Gajanand Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 500, Kanota Saind Ki Puliya Kanota Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ---Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Rajendra Singh Rajawat for Mr. Deepak Chauhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)
Order 11/06/2025 This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in respect of FIR No.184/2025 registered with Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 304(2), 329(3), 109(1) and 351(2)(3) of BNS.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the FIR whereas no offence alleged has been committed by them. There are general allegations against all the persons implicated as accused in FIR and injuries, if sustained by the injured, have not
[2025:RJ-JP:23092] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6928/2025] been assigned to the petitioners. The accused-petitioners are ladies and only on account of their presence on site, false allegations have been levelled. No investigation is pending against them nor they are required for custodial interrogation. Even as per Section 483 while considering bail application, in appropriate case bail can be granted to a woman. They are behind the bars since
12.05.2025. Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Considered the submissions made at Bar. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioners-Heera Meena W/o Shri Suraj Meena and Guddi Devi W/o Shri Gajanand Meena shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.184/2025 registered with Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) on furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.
[2025:RJ-JP:23092] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6928/2025] (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. In case of failure of observance of aforementioned conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail, would arise.
(ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J DIKSHA /412